The U.S. Department of Justice has indicated to a federal judge that it may recommend breaking up Google to address the harm caused by its dominance in the online search market. Such a move would mark a historic antitrust action against one of the world's largest tech companies.
Leah Nylen for Bloomberg News:
The Justice Department "is considering behavioral and structural remedies that would prevent Google from using products such as Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google search and Google search-related products and features -- including emerging search access points and features, such as artificial intelligence -- over rivals or new entrants," the agency said in the filing.
The filing represents Washington's first push to dismantle a company for illegal monopolization since unsuccessful efforts to break up Microsoft Corp. two decades ago. The 32-page filing lays outs a framework of potential options for the judge to consider as the case moves to the remedy phase.
Antitrust enforcers said Google gained scale and data benefits from its illegal distribution agreements with other tech companies that made make its search engine the default option on smartphones and web browsers.
MacDailyNews Take: Again, Google monopolized both the search and online advertising markets years ago when they bought politicians via myriad campaign contributions (monetary and services provided) who then pushed through approval of Google's acquisition of DoubleClick in 2007 that never should have been rubber-stamped.
While we wish Apple wouldn't take Google's money because the monopolized online Search Engine + Digital Ad Network that exists today (and has for years) is bad for everyone not named Alphabet Inc., Apple certainly has the right to monetize Safari's default search engine - until they don't. With both companies so large, it may be -- in fact, is very likely -- that the deal stifles competition in the search engine field. Antitrust remedies are called for in such cases. - MacDailyNews, September 11, 2023
Google is a massive problem that simply must be addressed. There is one "Big Tech" company that is really stifling competition and for which antitrust remedies are in order: Alphabet (Google). -- MacDailyNews, October 20, 2020
When one search engine has [91.53% - Oct. 2023] share of the worldwide market (and Google basically isn't even used in China), there is far, far, far too much power concentrated in one company. The whole concept of the World Wide Web is destroyed when a sole gatekeeper basically controls what gets seen, read, and heard. It's not open, it's completely closed and controlled.
Publishers who want to be read, for example, spend an inordinate amount of time making sure they follow Google's dictates, nebulously sussed from Google's secret algorithm, formatting their sites, even writing their articles a certain way, including certain words they might not choose if allowed to write freely, simply to please Google's algorithm...
Hopefully, lawmakers can come together to figure out a way to do something to remedy the horribly uncompetitive situation in internet search. Google is, and has been for years, a perfect example of why antitrust laws exist. -- MacDailyNews, July 29, 2020
With this unprecedented power, platforms have the ability to redirect into their pockets the advertising dollars that once went to newspapers and magazines. No one company should have the power to pick and choose which content reaches consumers and which doesn't. -- MacDailyNews, November 9, 2017
Imagine if your livelihood depended on one company that had not only monopolized web search (and, thereby, basically controlled how new customers find you), but also controlled the bulk of online advertising dollars which funded your business and which they could pull, simply threaten to pull, or reduce rates at any time? Now also imagine if you believe this monopolist basically stole the product of another company that is the very subject of your business? How much would you criticize the monopolist thief's business practices?
You might guess that it would be a tough road to walk. (We're only imagining, of course!)
That would be a good example of why monopolies are bad for everyone.
The U.S. government has utterly failed to police Google. Because the people with the power to do so currently are corrupt. Follow the money. Hopefully, the European Union will help to correct the situation.
In the meantime, stop using Google search and Google products wherever possible. Monopolies are bad for everyone. -- MacDailyNews, July 14, 2016
If just 10% of our daily visitors each subscribed for $5 a month, this site would have no advertising at all (and we'd be free of Google's SEO and other shackles). Thank you so much to our subscribers who keep MacDailyNews running!
Please help support MacDailyNews -- and enjoy subscriber-only articles, comments, chat, and more -- by subscribing to our Substack: macdailynews.substack.com. Thank you!