Quick LinksCliffhanger Is Better Than Its Reputation Why Did the Razzies Hate Cliffhanger? Cliffhanger Didn't Deserve Its Razzie Nods

In their over four decades of existence, it's safe to say that no cinematic institution draws as much enthusiasm or disdain as the Golden Raspberry Awards or Razzies. Founded in 1981 by John Wilson and Mo Murphy, the Razzies were initially meant to function as a satirical counter to the Academy Awards, hosting an annual "celebration" of the worst movies of the year. But while some consider the Razzies a hilarious counter to how self-congratulatory the awards season can get, almost as many people find the show mean-spirited and just as prone to picking the easy targets as the Oscars.

✕ Remove Ads

Indeed, much like the Academy Awards, the Razzies regularly play favorites, frequently nominating the likes of Adam Sandler, Tyler Perry, and M. Night Shyamalan. But by far, their biggest whipping boy, almost from the start, has been Sylvester Stallone, who holds a record of 40 Razzie nominations and 12 wins. In the ceremony's first couple of decades, it almost became a running joke to nominate Stallone, but many of his nods were arguably undeserved, the most egregious of which even got a Worst Picture nomination 30 years ago.

Cliffhanger ActionAdventureThriller Main Genre Action Studio StudioCanal Tagline Hold on. Cliffhanger Is Better Than Its Reputation Close ✕ Remove Ads

1993's Cliffhanger came at what seemed to be a breaking point for Sylvester Stallone's career. Despite breaking out in 1976 with the Best Picture-winning classic Rocky, which got him Oscar nominations for Lead Actor and Original Screenplay, his track record had become significantly spottier since. And in the early '90s, coming off numerous critical pans like Rocky V and the absolutely dire Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot, Cliffhanger looked destined to make or break his career.

Thankfully, in teaming up with director Renny Harlin, fresh off the massive success of Die Hard 2, the signs seemed encouraging. With Stallone co-writing a script, they made Cliffhanger, based on a story idea by famed rock climber and author John Long. His premise functioned as a sort of Die Hard in the mountains, kicking off when former military intelligence operative Eric Qualen (John Lithgow) pulls off a midair heist to steal over $100 million from a US Treasury plane.

✕ Remove Ads Related Tom Cruise's 'Crazy Invincibility Complex' Could Cause Him a Serious Injury

The 62-year-old actor isn't slowing down, as is evident from him hanging upside down from an airplane in Mission: Impossible 8.

However, their plane crashes in the Colorado Rockies, stranding Qualen and his team in the mountains and scattering the suitcases full of money. They send a distress call to mountain rescue ranger Gabe Walker (Stallone), who's dealing with survivor's guilt after the death of a friend in a climbing accident. The terrorists capture Gabe upon his arrival and force him to retrieve the suitcases of money.

✕ Remove Ads

What's most refreshing about Cliffhanger is how it holds no pretensions about what kind of movie it is. The plot is utterly absurd, but it's not trying to be high art; it mostly functions as a way for Harlin and Stallone to deliver tense action sequences with stunts that would initially seem preposterous until realizing they were performed practically. It's a hugely impressive film on the technical level (it even got Oscar nominations for Sound Mixing, Sound Editing, and Visual Effects but lost all to Jurassic Park), intending to thrill the audience first and foremost. It's a ridiculous but hugely enjoyable blockbuster that delivers exactly what it promises -- nothing more, nothing less. It's not without good reason that fans have been awaiting a sequel for years, which might finally be entering production soon.

Why Did the Razzies Hate Cliffhanger? Close ✕ Remove Ads

For such a make-or-break point in Stallone's career, Cliffhanger proved the success he desperately needed. While it only performed modestly in the US, earning roughly $84 million on a $70 million budget, it more than doubled this amount overseas, becoming the seventh highest-grossing film of the year worldwide. In what was becoming an increasingly rare scenario for Stallone, the movie received mostly good reviews from critics and audiences; it currently boasts 68% approval on Rotten Tomatoes and positive remarks from the likes of Roger Ebert.

And yet, this positive public opinion didn't exactly translate to the awards circuit. While it did get three technical Oscar nominations, it also landed four Razzie nods, most notably for Worst Supporting Actor (John Lithgow), Worst Screenplay, and Worst Picture. The last nomination is particularly baffling, as most agree that while Cliffhanger isn't exactly high art, it's nowhere near among the worst films of 1993. Especially when that year also included Cop and a Half, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III, Son of the Pink Panther, and Super Mario Bros., none of which landed a Worst Picture nod, it now seems like an even more dated choice.

✕ Remove Ads Related The Expendables Franchise is Leaving Netflix Soon

The star-studded action franchise will be removed from Netflix at the end of the month.

1

So why did the Razzies go with Cliffhanger? The most obvious answer seems to be the organization's dislike of Sylvester Stallone. Never mind the fact that he'd made his most critically and commercially successful work in a long time, Stallone had been nominated at the Razzies for the last nine consecutive years, to the point where his name popping up in the nominations seemed more and more like a deliberate joke. If anyone other than Stallone had taken the starring role, it's hard to imagine the Razzies would've taken the bait, especially not over Cop and a Half, which is now widely considered one of the worst films of the '90s.

✕ Remove Ads

Of course, this also ties into a much larger issue with the Razzies as an organization. For a group that brands itself as being anti-Oscars, they're every bit as guilty of trend-chasing and going after the easy targets. Consider how they crowned The Twilight Saga - Breaking Dawn: Part 2 as the 2012-13 Worst Picture. It's almost unanimously agreed that fellow nominees That's My Boy and The Oogieloves were much worse, but Twilight was as easy a target as you could possibly be in 2012. And earlier this year, Megan Fox won two Razzies despite the fact that one of those films barely made a blip in the public consciousness. It just looked like an organization beating a dead horse that stopped being funny years ago.

Cliffhanger Didn't Deserve Its Razzie Nods Close ✕ Remove Ads

While no one is going to argue that Cliffhanger is a cinematic achievement on par with The Godfather, it's a perfectly acceptable and occasionally pretty fun action thriller. It's not high art, but it has no aspirations of being so, and that dedication to delivering dumb fun should frankly be celebrated when done well.

It's certainly not deserving of its Razzie nominations, which were likely for no reason other than Stallone's involvement. Maybe we shouldn't expect much better from an award show that thinks nominating children for bad acting awards is funny. Cliffhanger is streaming on Paramount+.

✕ Remove Ads